He's SO NOT THE MVP!!
Granted, David Ortiz does indeed warrant consideration for the MVP this year, he had a tremendous year. He hit 148 RBI's, many of them in the late innings, and a large portion of them either tied the game or put the Red Sox ahead in the late innings. He definitely helped carry the Red Sox into the post season as his clutch hitting can not be argued. His average with RISP was highest in the AL and in "pressure situations" he has a better average than the other guy who happens to be in this conversation...Alex Rodriguez. For more on these ridiculous stats that will never show up in a box score, check out Baseball Prospectus. He only hit .300 for the season, (yeah...only) and finished 2nd in HR to Arod (only one shy).
Looking at Rodriguez, its clear that he as well had a fabulous year. he hit .321 (21 points higher than Ortiz), led the AL in homers, was a top 5 RBI man, and he stole 21 bases. Not only could he drive in runs, but he could help manufacture them. Ortiz stole only one bag this season, and I'm pretty sure I saw that game on NESN, and they just gave him second base. Stolen bases may be somewhat of an arcane measure of a player, but teams and players that can move runners into scoring position without even swinging the bat can usually win a few ballgames. Look at Chicago this year, or even the Devil Rays, who posted one of the best records after the All-Star break in all of baseball. But for some reason, everyone ignores stolen bases and doesn't think they are worth anything real. (Even though a SB is just as many points as a HR in many fantasy baseball circles)
Detractors on Alex say that he's not even the MVP on his own team, or even the most feared hitter on his own team. This is 100% true. Gary Sheffield swings the angriest bat in the history of baseball and he will send the ball over the fence faster than it got to the plate. And without Mo Rivera, the Yankees wouldn't have even sniffed the playoffs (pitchers, however, rarely win the MVP award.) However, the same arguments could be made about Ortiz. Many view Johnny Damon as the MVP of the team, both emotionally and on the field. As much as I dislike the guy, he gets it done, and was a catalyst on more than one occasion for the Sox offense (but he throws like a girl, and we all know that girls can't win the MVP). And the only reason David saw as many pitches as he did was because of a little guy named Manny Ortez...*ahem* Ramirez. (Probably one of the best pure hitters in the game right now) So we have to throw that argument out.
So on WEEI I have heard guys say that Ortiz is more valuable because you are getting more production per dollar spent on the player (Ortiz made made between 1 and 3 million, as opposed to Arod's bazillion dollars). Now, as an economics student, I appreciate the attempt put a dollar value on baseball skills. But as a baseball fan and a realist, Baseball and Economics just don't mix, as the economy in baseball is just so far out of whack that you can't make any arguments about anything except who spends more money. (somebody please explain to me how Eric Milton made $5.33 mil for that pathetic season last year?!?!)
So with offensive numbers (standard offensive numbers, i'm not going into the whole sabrmetrics thing) very similar that its too close to call, comparisons to ones own teammates drawing similar conclusions, Stolen bases getting (wrongfully) ignored, and player cost verse player production being the most ignorant argument for MVP status on the planet, we have only one more real area to cover....
Alex Rodriguez Plays Defense. He's actually a Gold Glove calibur 3rd baseman, who converted from Short Stop (his natural position) on his arrival in New York. Now lets assume that on offense, each player is involved in between 7 and 10 plays per game. And on defense, seeing how the ball can be played anywhere at anytime, you are involved in all 27 outs made. Your average AL team will get between 27 and 40 ABs per game. Now lets say that we only count the defensive plays where a player actually has to make a play. We'll say that at 3rd base Alex is involved in 9 plays a game, whether he's fielding a ground ball, catching a pop fly...whatever. (thats a fairly conservative estimate, because they don't call it the 'hot corner' for nothing) Now Ortiz had 601 ABs. He also played about 6 games at 1B during interleage play. So thats maybe 620 plays all season that you have to judge him on. Alex Rodriguez had 605 ABs, a negligable difference. But if we factor in the 9 plays a game that he could potentially be involved in, times 162 games, thats an additional 1458 plays to be judged on. Over 2000 plays. And over 2000 plays, Alex Rodriguez was a first class player. Thats not to say on any one play he didn't stink like yesterday's garbage, but on the aggregate, he was great. And his aggregate is much larger than David Ortiz. Now if Alex Rodriguez was the worst fielding 3B in the league, and he hurt his team in the field more than he helped (much like Ortiz or Jason Giambi would) then I would just as soon hand the award over to Ortiz. But the fact of the matter is, Alex Rodriguez is a great all around player, all year, while Ortiz was just a great hitter. You win ballgames with sticks AND gloves people.
These arguments aren't about Red Sox or Yankees, so don't even start to get all in a fit, because it is well known that I am a Yankees fan. But I'm also a purist. I long for the days when a CG was a normality, not an anomoly, and when the DH didn't even exist. Maybe I'm just old fashioned though...